Blu Baker vs Alexis Gurmendi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Baker's second serve is marginally stronger, winning 44.42% of points, compared to Gurmendi's 43.18%.
• Gurmendi excels in return games, securing 51.69% of their opponent's second serves, superior to Baker's 48.5%.
• For first serve returns, Baker leads with 33.29%, overshadowing Gurmendi's 27.41% success rate.
• Facing breakpoints, Baker exhibits better resilience, saving 54.4% compared to Gurmendi's 51.25%.
• In the past year, Baker's winning record stands at 73.33% (22/8), surpassing Gurmendi's 64.71% (11/6).
• Both players perform best on clay, with Baker having a 67% win rate and Gurmendi at 60%.
• In terms of match level, Baker consistently participates and wins in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 73.33%, more than Gurmendi's 64.71% in similar events.
• Head-to-head, Baker has a slight edge, winning their only clash and leading 2-1 in sets.
• The previous encounter between them lasted over two hours, indicating closely fought matches.
• Both players struggle in tiebreak situations against one another, having never played a tiebreak in their matches.
• While Baker played against weaker opponents with an average rank of 381.67, Gurmendi faced tougher competition, with an average rank of 279.59.
• For matches going to a deciding set, Baker has a slight advantage, winning 64% of such sets compared to Gurmendi's 63%.
• Analyzing breakpoint conversion, Baker leads with 38.33% compared to Gurmendi’s 36.17%.

Editorial Prediction (August 14, 2025, UTC):

As anticipation builds for the upcoming match between Baker and Gurmendi, their head-to-head comparison reveals intriguing insights. Baker holds a slight advantage in direct encounters, having defeated Gurmendi in their only previous match, a closely contested battle on clay.

While Baker’s second serve is slightly superior, Gurmendi matches this by excelling in return games, particularly against the second serve. Despite this, Baker’s strong breakpoint saving ability could prove crucial under pressure.

Both athletes have shown a preference for clay courts, although Baker has the edge with a higher win rate on this surface. The lack of tiebreaker experience between the two may suggest a different dynamic during high-pressure points.

When considering match intensity, past performances suggest another tight contest, with both players having remarkably similar records in deciding sets. However, external factors, such as opponent quality and event level, could play a role, with Baker potentially more comfortable in similar tournament conditions.

Based on these analysis, Baker appears slightly favored due to their previous victory in direct meetings and slightly superior performance metrics in key areas. Thus, Baker is predicted to have the upper hand and is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.